Skip Navigation



Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on January 25, 2006

Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/arj038
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/3/392    most recent
arj038v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hauglund, K.
Right arrow Articles by Lampe, H. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hauglund, K.
Right arrow Articles by Lampe, H. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received July 7, 2003
Revised December 21, 2005
Accepted January 2, 2006

Article

Responses of domestic chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus) to multimodal aposematic signals

Katrine Hauglund 1, Snorre B. Hagen 1, and Helene M. Lampe 1 *

1 Department of Biology, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1066 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Helene M. Lampe, E-mail: h.m.lampe{at}bio.uio.no


   Abstract

Many aposematic prey combine their visual warning signals with additional signals. Together, these signals constitute a multimodal or multicomponent warning display. The additional signals are thought to increase the effects of the visual signals on predators. Olfactory signals are much emphasized, but later studies have shown that also auditory signals like the buzzing of certain insects might have multimodal effects. The wasp displays typical visual aposematic signals, black and yellow stripes, but does also emit a characteristic buzzing. We wanted to test if, and in what way, the visual and acoustic display of the wasp has an aversive function on the predators. We therefore conducted a 12-trial discrimination-learning task on inexperienced chicks to study whether there are innate biases toward these signals and how they affect the speed of avoidance learning. We also performed three extinction-learning trials to study how memorable the signals were to the chicks. We show that the visual signals in the display of the wasp contribute to the protection from predators but in different ways; the yellow color had an aversive effect on inexperienced predators, while the striped pattern improved the aversion learning. The sound did not enhance the innate aversions but increased the aversion learning of stripes in green prey.

Keywords: aposematism; avoidance learning; chicks; innate biases; multimodal signals; sound; stripes.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
M. Aronsson and G. Gamberale-Stille
Importance of internal pattern contrast and contrast against the background in aposematic signals
Behav. Ecol., November 2, 2009; (2009) arp141v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
J. S. Hunter
Familiarity breeds contempt: effects of striped skunk color, shape, and abundance on wild carnivore behavior
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2009; 20(6): 1315 - 1322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.