Skip Navigation



Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on March 8, 2006

Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/arj056
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/3/419    most recent
arj056v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heg, D.
Right arrow Articles by Taborsky, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Heg, D.
Right arrow Articles by Taborsky, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received May 5, 2005
Revised December 30, 2005
Accepted January 10, 2006

Article

Cichlids do not adjust reproductive skew to the availability of independent breeding options

Dik Heg 1 *, Ralph Bergmüller 1, Danielle Bonfils 1, Oliver Otti 1, Zina Bachar 1, Reto Burri 2, Gerald Heckel 2, and Michael Taborsky 1

1 Department of Behavioural Ecology, Zoological Institute, University of Bern, Wohlenstrasse 50a, CH-3032 Hinterkappelen, Switzerland
2 Computational and Molecular Population Genetics Lab, Zoological Institute, University of Bern, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Dik Heg, E-mail: dik.heg{at}esh.unibe.ch


   Abstract

Helpers in cooperatively breeding species forego all or part of their reproduction when remaining at home and assisting breeders to raise offspring. Different models of reproductive skew generate alternative predictions about the share of reproduction unrelated subordinates will get depending on the degree of ecological constraints. Concession models predict a larger share when independent breeding options are good, whereas restraint and tug-of-war models predict no effects on reproductive skew. We tested these predictions by determining the share of reproduction by unrelated male and female helpers in the Lake Tanganyika cichlid Neolamprologus pulcher depending on experimentally manipulated possibilities for helper dispersal and independent breeding and depending on helper size and sex. We created 32 breeding groups in the laboratory, consisting of two breeders and two helpers each, where only the helpers had access to a nearby dispersal compartment with (treatment) or without (control) breeding substrate, using a repeated measures design. We determined the paternity and maternity of 1185 offspring from 47 broods using five to nine DNA microsatellite loci and found that: (1) helpers participated in reproduction equally across the treatments, (2) large male helpers were significantly more likely to reproduce than small helpers, and (3) male helpers engaged in significantly more reproduction than female helpers. Interestingly, in four broods, extragroup helper males had fertilized part of the brood. No helper evictions from the group after helper reproduction were observed. Our results suggest that tug-of-war models based on competition over reproduction within groups describe best the reproductive skew observed in our study system. Female breeders produced larger clutches in the treatment compared to the control situation when the large helpers were males. This suggests that male breeder-male helper reproductive conflicts may be alleviated by females producing larger clutches with helpers around.

Keywords: Cichlidae; clutch size adjustment; cooperative breeding; ecological constraints; reproductive partitioning.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
M. Kohda, D. Heg, Y. Makino, T. Takeyama, J.-y. Shibata, K. Watanabe, H. Munehara, M. Hori, and S. Awata
Living on the wedge: female control of paternity in a cooperatively polyandrous cichlid
Proc R Soc B, December 7, 2009; 276(1676): 4207 - 4214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
J. Field and M. A. Cant
Social stability and helping in small animal societies
Phil Trans R Soc B, November 12, 2009; 364(1533): 3181 - 3189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
P. M. Buston and A. G. Zink
Reproductive skew and the evolution of conflict resolution: a synthesis of transactional and tug-of-war models
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2009; 20(3): 672 - 684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
A. F Russell and V. Lummaa
Maternal effects in cooperative breeders: from hymenopterans to humans
Phil Trans R Soc B, April 27, 2009; 364(1520): 1143 - 1167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
J.L Fitzpatrick, J.K Desjardins, N Milligan, K.A Stiver, R Montgomerie, and S Balshine
Female-mediated causes and consequences of status change in a social fish
Proc R Soc B, April 22, 2008; 275(1637): 929 - 936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
I. M. Hamilton and D. Heg
Clutch-size adjustments and skew models: effects on reproductive partitioning and group stability
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2007; 18(2): 467 - 476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.