Skip Navigation



Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on May 11, 2006
Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/ark012
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/4/664    most recent
ark012v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gilchrist, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gilchrist, J. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received September 7, 2005
Revised April 11, 2006
Accepted April 14, 2006

Article

Female eviction, abortion, and infanticide in banded mongooses (Mungos mungo): implications for social control of reproduction and synchronized parturition

Jason S. Gilchrist 1 *

1 Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Jason S. Gilchrist, E-mail: j.gilchrist{at}napier.ac.uk


  Abstract

Most cooperatively breeding species exhibit high reproductive skew, where reproduction within the social group is monopolized by a dominant pair. In many of these species, social control of reproduction is the mechanism driving reproductive skew: individuals within the social group actively reduce the reproductive success of others. In species where females do not suppress conception in other females, alternative routes to skewing the social group's reproductive output include inducing abortion in rivals, evicting them, or killing their young. This study examines instances of female eviction, abortion, and infanticide in a cooperatively breeding species with low preparturition reproductive skew, the banded mongoose (Mungos mungo). Although instances of these behaviors are rare in this species, aspects of their occurrence have implications for social control of reproduction. Abortion can be induced by the stress of being evicted. The readmittance of females that abort suggests that reducing communal litter size is a possible selective pressure for eviction. This is supported by the occurrence of eviction events in groups with relatively high numbers of reproductive females and by the eviction of young reproductive females. The timing of abortion events suggests that synchronization of parturition with other females in the group is a major selective pressure. Infanticide could represent the selective pressure for synchronized parturition. Alternatively, synchronization may minimize competitive asymmetry between pups born to different females. This paper also describes incidences where a female aborts or gives birth to her litter over different days in order to synchronize parturition: behavior previously unrecorded in mammals.

Keywords: abortion; communal breeding; cooperative breeding; eviction; infanticide; reproductive skew; synchrony.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Proc R Soc BHome page
W. Saltzman, L. J Digby, and D. H Abbott
Reproductive skew in female common marmosets: what can proximate mechanisms tell us about ultimate causes?
Proc R Soc B, February 7, 2009; 276(1656): 389 - 399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc R Soc BHome page
A.-K. Eggert, T. Otte, and J. K Muller
Starving the competition: a proximate cause of reproductive skew in burying beetles (Nicrophorus vespilloides)
Proc R Soc B, November 7, 2008; 275(1650): 2521 - 2528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.