Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on June 1, 2006
Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/ark018
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Sexual dimorphism in immunocompetence, usually in the direction of inferior male immunocompetence, has historically been explained as the result of proximate physiological mechanisms such as the immunosuppressive effects of the male hormone testosterone. More recently, it has been argued that this pattern is best understood as a result of resource-based trade-offs between male mating effort and immune defense, a trade-off that females do not make. The central prediction of this hypothesis is that as the strength of sexual selection on males increases, the magnitude of the sex differences in immunocompetence will increase. Two implicit assumptions of this argument are that 1) longevity is of more importance for female than for male fitness and 2) that the primary benefit of immunocompetence is increased longevity. However, both of these assumptions may not be as broadly applicable as has been argued. We have modeled the optimal allocation to immunocompetence for males and females without making these assumptions. We find that the optimal allocation to immune defense for males decreases as the strength of sexual selection increases, as predicted. However, males may still invest more, relative to females, into immunocompetence if the impact of parasites on condition differs for the sexes and/or if the relationship between condition and reproduction differs for the sexes. We argue that these previously overlooked assumptions may be critical for predicting sex-specific patterns of immunocompetence.
Received October 18, 2005
Revised April 25, 2006
Accepted May 3, 2006
Article
Sexual dimorphism in immunocompetence: what does life-history theory predict?
Andrew M. Stoehr 1 *
and
Hanna Kokko 2
2 Laboratory of Ecological and Evolutionary Dynamics, Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Helsinki, Finland
Andrew M. Stoehr, E-mail: andrew.stoehr{at}email.ucr.edu
Abstract 
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  W. E Winterhalter and K. M Fedorka Sex-specific variation in the emphasis, inducibility and timing of the post-mating immune response in Drosophila melanogaster Proc R Soc B, March 22, 2009; 276(1659): 1109 - 1117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. A. Hillegass, J. M. Waterman, and J. D. Roth The influence of sex and sociality on parasite loads in an African ground squirrel Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2008; 19(5): 1006 - 1011. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M Reid, P. Arcese, L. F Keller, K. H Elliott, L. Sampson, and D. Hasselquist Inbreeding effects on immune response in free-living song sparrows (Melospiza melodia) Proc R Soc B, March 7, 2007; 274(1610): 697 - 706. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|