Skip Navigation



Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on July 13, 2006
Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/arl019
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/5/849    most recent
arl019v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dobbs, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, C. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dobbs, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, C. F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received February 2, 2006
Revised April 23, 2006
Accepted June 1, 2006

Article

Clutch size and the costs of incubation in the house wren

Robert C. Dobbs 1, John D. Styrsky 1, and Charles F. Thompson 1 *

1 Behavior, Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics Section, Department of Biological Sciences, Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61790-4120, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Charles F. Thompson, E-mail: wrens{at}ilstu.edu


  Abstract

Trade-offs in the allocation of finite resources among different stages of a breeding attempt as well as between different reproductive events should shape the evolution of life-history traits. To investigate the effects of incubation effort on within-brood and between-brood trade-offs in house wrens (Troglodytes aedon), we manipulated the clutch size that females incubated. We isolated effects of incubation by reversing the manipulation at hatching to allow all parents to provision their natural brood sizes. Females that incubated enlarged clutches had longer incubation periods than control females, both early and late in the season, suggesting that the experimental treatment increased incubation effort. Contrary to predictions, however, increased incubation effort did not adversely affect the allocation of effort to nestling provisioning. Rather, in the early season, but not in the late season, females that incubated enlarged clutches appeared to allocate more effort to nestling provisioning, producing heavier and larger fledglings than control females. Although females with enlarged early-season clutches consequently lost more mass than control females, this was likely an adaptive response to reduce wing loading in anticipation of high provisioning demands. There were no treatment-related differences in fledgling mass or size, or in female mass loss, in the late season. Thus, elevated incubation demands negatively affected a fitness-related trait (duration of incubation) that may constrain clutch size but not the allocation of resources to subsequent stages of the same breeding event or to subsequent breeding events. We suggest that environmental conditions may mediate clutch-size effects on trade-offs in allocation of resources between incubation and nestling provisioning.

Keywords: clutch size; house wren; incubation; life history; trade-offs; Troglodytes aedon.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Biol LettHome page
J. H Perez, D. R Ardia, E. K Chad, and E. D Clotfelter
Experimental heating reveals nest temperature affects nestling condition in tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor)
Biol Lett, October 23, 2008; 4(5): 468 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
D. R. Ardia and E. D. Clotfelter
Individual quality and age affect responses to an energetic constraint in a cavity-nesting bird
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2007; 18(1): 259 - 266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.