Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on October 11, 2006
Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/arl061
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Zoology, Charles University, Vini
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Predators may either learn to avoid aposematic prey or may avoid it because of an innate bias. Learned as well as innate avoidance has been observed in birds, but the existing evidence is based on experiments with rather few unrelated model species. We compared the origin of avoidance in European species of tits (Paridae). First, we tested whether wild-caught birds (blue tits, great tits, crested tits, coal tits, willow tits, and marsh tits) avoid aposematic (red and black) adult firebugs Pyrrhocoris apterus (Heteroptera) more than nonaposematic (brown painted) ones. Larger proportion of birds avoided aposematic than brown-painted firebugs in majority of species (except coal tits). Second, we tested whether naive hand-reared birds of 4 species (blue tits, great tits, crested tits, and coal tits) attack or avoid aposematic and nonaposematic firebugs, both novel for them. Behavior of the naive blue tits and coal tits was similar to that of the wild-caught birds; majority of them did not attack the firebugs. Contrastingly, the naive great tits and crested tits behaved differently than the wild-caught conspecific adults; majority of the wild-caught birds avoided the aposematic firebugs, whereas the naive birds usually did not show any initial avoidance and had to learn to avoid the aposematic prey. Our results show that the origin of avoidance may be different even in closely related species. Because blue tits and coal tits avoided not only aposematic firebugs but also their brown-painted form, we interpret their behavior as innate neophobia rather than innate bias against the warning coloration.
Received February 20, 2006
Revised August 29, 2006
Accepted September 11, 2006
Article
Avoidance of aposematic prey in European tits (Paridae): learned or innate?
Alice Exnerová 1 *, Pavel
tys 1, Eva Fu
íková 1, Silvie Veselá 2, Kate
ina Svádová 1, Milena Prokopová 2, Vojt
ch Jaro
ík 3, Roman Fuchs 4, and Eva Landová 1
ná 7, CZ 128 44 Prague, Czech Republic
2 Department of Zoology, University of South Bohemia, Brani
ovská 31,
eské Bud
jovice, Czech Republic
3 Department of Ecology, Charles University, Vini
ná 7, Prague, Czech Republic; Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Pr
honice, Czech Republic
4 Department of Zoology, Charles University, Vini
ná 7, CZ 128 44 Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Zoology, University of South Bohemia, Brani
ovská 31,
eské Bud
jovice, Czech Republic
Alice Exnerová, E-mail: exnerova{at}natur.cuni.cz
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Exnerova, K. H. Svadova, E. Fucikova, P. Drent, and P. Stys Personality matters: individual variation in reactions of naive bird predators to aposematic prey Proc R Soc B, November 4, 2009; (2009) rspb.2009.1673v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Hunter Familiarity breeds contempt: effects of striped skunk color, shape, and abundance on wild carnivore behavior Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2009; 20(6): 1315 - 1322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

