Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access first published online on March 22, 2007
This version published online on March 23, 2007

Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/arm020
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/3/621    most recent
arm020v2
arm020v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pryke, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pryke, S. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Fiery red heads: female dominance among head color morphs in the Gouldian finch

Sarah R. Pryke

School of Biological, Earth, and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia

Address correspondence to S.R. Pryke. E-mail: sarah.pryke{at}unsw.edu.au.


   Abstract

Although the evolution of genetic color polymorphisms has received much theoretical interest, few empirical studies have investigated the adaptive function of alternative color morphs. Furthermore, most studies have focused almost exclusively on the evolution and adaptive expression of male coloration, leaving the role of conspicuous female coloration largely unknown. Using the color polymorphic Gouldian finch (Erythrura gouldiae), this study experimentally tests the status signaling function of head color (red, yellow, and black) among the 3 female color morphs. In standardized dominance contests between unfamiliar females of different head colors, red-headed females dominated both black- and yellow-headed females. During contests between the morphs, red-headed females passively displaced black- and yellow-headed opponents, whereas interactions between red-headed dyads were particularly aggressive and more frequent than interactions within dyads of the other color morphs. This effect of red dominance further persisted when head color was experimentally altered; red-manipulated females (of the other morphs) dominated both black- and yellow-headed females, whereas blackened red-headed females were dominated by naturally red-headed birds. Together with similar dominance-related differences among male morphs, these results suggest that the 3 color morphs may display alternative strategies in dominance behavior.

Key words: color polymorphism, female dominance, Gouldian finch, plumage coloration, status signaling.

Received 27 October 2006; revised 11 February 2007; accepted 12 February 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
P. D. Dijkstra, S. van Dijk, T. G.G. Groothuis, M. E.R. Pierotti, and O. Seehausen
Behavioral dominance between female color morphs of a Lake Victoria cichlid fish
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2009; 20(3): 593 - 600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
P. R Grant and B. R. Grant
Pedigrees, assortative mating and speciation in Darwin's finches
Proc R Soc B, March 22, 2008; 275(1635): 661 - 668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
P. D Dijkstra, O. Seehausen, and T. G.G Groothuis
Intrasexual competition among females and the stabilization of a conspicuous colour polymorphism in a Lake Victoria cichlid fish
Proc R Soc B, March 7, 2008; 275(1634): 519 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.