Skip Navigation



Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on July 9, 2007

Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/arm050
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/5/831    most recent
arm050v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakagawa, S.
Right arrow Articles by Burke, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nakagawa, S.
Right arrow Articles by Burke, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Assessing the function of house sparrows' bib size using a flexible meta-analysis method

Shinichi Nakagawa, Nancy Ockendon, Duncan O. S. Gillespie, Ben J. Hatchwell and Terry Burke

Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK

Address correspondence to S. Nakagawa. E-mail: itchyshin{at}yahoo.co.nz.


   Abstract

The black throat patch or bib of male house sparrows, Passer domesticus, is often referred to as a "badge of status" or a "badge" because previous studies have shown bib size to be correlated with the social status of males. Yet, little is known about how strong and robust this relationship is and how the strength of this relationship compares with that of other associations. We conducted a meta-analysis for 6 well-studied correlates of bib size: fighting ability, parental ability (egg incubation and food provisioning), age, body condition, cuckoldry, and reproductive success. We introduce a flexible meta-analysis method in this study that is better suited in the biological sciences than the methods usually employed in popular meta-analysis software because our method accounts for a common form of nonindependence of the data. The relationship between fighting ability and bib size was found to be strong and robust, and the relationship between age and bib size was moderate and robust. Also, body condition was weakly but significantly correlated with badge size. The other parameters showed nonsignificant small effects and/or large confidence intervals. Therefore, we conclude that bib size signals dominance and to a lesser extent age and possibly reflects body condition in house sparrows. There was weak evidence that bib size is currently under sexual selection because there was little association between reproductive success and bib size. This is surprising as the bib size probably affects the outcome of male–male competition. Empirical data on sparrow bib size could not be reconciled with sexual selection theory, although there is ample evidence that it is a condition-dependent trait.

Key words: age, badge of status, condition-dependent trait, house sparrow, meta-analysis, sexual selection.

Received 16 October 2006; revised 23 April 2007; accepted 25 April 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
G. Beauchamp
What is the magnitude of the group-size effect on vigilance?
Behav. Ecol., July 30, 2008; (2008) arn096v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.