Skip Navigation



Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on July 17, 2007

Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/arm055
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/5/860    most recent
arm055v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sundaresan, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Rubenstein, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sundaresan, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Rubenstein, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved.For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Male harassment influences female movements and associations in Grevy's zebra (Equus grevyi)

Siva R. Sundaresan, Ilya R. Fischhoff and DI Rubenstein

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA

Address correspondence to S.R. Sundaresan, who is now at the Department of Conservation Biology, Denver Zoological Foundation, Denver, CO 80205, USA. E-mail: ssundare{at}princeton.edu.


   Abstract

In traditional models for social organization, female movements and association patterns track resource distribution, whereas males track females. More recently, this model has been expanded to include feedback effects of male behavior, especially sexual harassment, on female decisions. In Grevy's zebra (Equus grevyi), males defend territories containing resources attractive to females, who form unstable groups. Past research has explained female behavior based on resource distribution and needs alone. Lactating females have been found to have restricted movements and fewer male associates than nonlactating females, a pattern we find in our study. This pattern has previously been attributed solely to the higher water needs of lactation. However, in our population, both lactating and nonlactating females are typically close to water. We test the hypothesis that male harassment also influences female ranging and associations with males. This effect is predicted to be greater for lactating females because harassment has higher costs to them. We find that lactating females experience higher harassment rates than those of nonlactating females. Lactating females tend to move faster during harassment periods, whereas nonlactating individuals do not. Lactating females experience lower harassment rates if they spend more time with a particular male, whereas nonlactating females' harassment rates do not depend on their allocation of time to a primary male. We suggest that females concentrate their time with one male in order to reduce male harassment. Even in species such as Grevy's zebra without strong male–female bonds, social interactions may be a significant driver of female distribution.

Key words: animal movement, associations, Equids, Grevy's zebra, sexual harassment, social organization.

Received 9 November 2006; revised 21 April 2007; accepted 3 May 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
S. K. Darden, R. James, I. W. Ramnarine, and D. P. Croft
Social implications of the battle of the sexes: sexual harassment disrupts female sociality and social recognition
Proc R Soc B, July 22, 2009; 276(1667): 2651 - 2656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.