Skip Navigation



Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on August 19, 2007

Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/arm070
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/6/1010    most recent
arm070v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hebets, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Vink, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hebets, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Vink, C. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Experience leads to preference: experienced females prefer brush-legged males in a population of syntopic wolf spiders

Eileen A. Hebetsa and Cor J. Vinkb

a School of Biological Sciences, 348 Manter Hall, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA b AgResearch, Lincoln Research Centre, Private Bag 4749, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand

Address correspondence to E.A. Hebets. E-mail: ehebets2{at}unl.edu.


   Abstract

Sexual selection has long been recognized as a potential contributor to the divergence in reproductive characters that ultimately leads to speciation. Schizocosa ocreata and Schizocosa rovneri wolf spiders embody a classic example of species divergence resulting from such sexual selection, as they are reproductively isolated by courtship behavior alone. Here, we characterize a newly discovered population of wolf spiders in which brush-legged males (sensu S. ocreata) and non-ornamented males (sensu S. rovneri) are found syntopically. Mitochondrial sequence data (cytochrome oxidase subunit 1) indicate that the 2 male forms are not reciprocally monophyletic. We exposed subadult females from this mixed population to courtship advances from either brush-legged or non-ornamented males. Experienced females mated significantly more with brush-legged males, whereas inexperienced females showed no mating distinction. In essence, we demonstrate that females from this population will differentially choose between males of 2 distinct forms based on prior experience. Specifically, experience leads to a preference for brush-legged males. We also show that brush-legged males are more sexually aggressive than non-ornamented males. This study highlights the importance of prior experience on subsequent mate choice and has potential implications regarding the extent to which experience can influence polymorphism maintenance and/or species divergence and the evolution of secondary sexual traits.

Key words: mate choice, plasticity, polymorphism, sexual aggression, speciation, subadult experience.

Received 21 December 2006; revised 9 July 2007; accepted 10 July 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
N. W Bailey and M. Zuk
Acoustic experience shapes female mate choice in field crickets
Proc R Soc B, November 22, 2008; 275(1651): 2645 - 2650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
E. A. Hebets
Seismic signal dominance in the multimodal courtship display of the wolf spider Schizocosa stridulans Stratton 1991
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2008; 19(6): 1250 - 1257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.