Skip Navigation



Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on August 16, 2007
Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/arm076
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/6/974    most recent
arm076v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wahaj, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Holekamp, K. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wahaj, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Holekamp, K. E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Siblicide in the spotted hyena: analysis with ultrasonic examination of wild and captive individuals

Sofia A. Wahaja, Ned J. Placeb, Mary L. Weldelea, Stephen E. Glickmana and Kay E. Holekampc

a Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA b Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine/Animal Health Diagnostic Center, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA c Department of Zoology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1115, USA

Address correspondence to K.E. Holekamp. E-mail: holekamp{at}msu.edu.


  Abstract

Integrated field and laboratory studies of long-lived, large-bodied mammals are rare but offer unique opportunities to elucidate the behavioral ecology of these animals. Here, we used this approach to examine whether siblicide in spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta) is obligate or facultative. First, we tested predictions of obligate and facultative hypotheses by using ultrasonography to compare litter size before and after parturition and identify potential causes of litter reduction. Second, we compared litter size and composition between wild and captive hyenas to assess variation in offspring sex ratios. Third, we used demographic data to compare survivorship among litters of various sizes and compositions. Fourth, we compared sex ratios within twin litters born in the wild under conditions of high population density and intense feeding competition with those born when population density and intensity of feeding competition were reduced. Our data were inconsistent with the obligate siblicide hypothesis. Litter reduction occurred during roughly one-third of pregnancies in both wild and captive hyenas, and all such reductions among captives were due to fetal resorptions or stillbirths. Litter sizes and compositions differed little between wild and captive hyenas. However, sex ratios in twin litters varied in the wild with intensity of feeding competition. In conjunction with captive data, long-term study of a wild hyena population under varying environmental conditions suggests facultative siblicide is most likely to occur when feeding competition is most intense, thus offering an ecological explanation for earlier conflicting reports on siblicide in this species.

Key words: Crocuta, hyenas, siblicide, sibling rivalry, siblings.

Received 30 May 2007; revised 30 May 2007; accepted 14 June 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Proc R Soc BHome page
H. E. Watts, J. B. Tanner, B. L. Lundrigan, and K. E. Holekamp
Post-weaning maternal effects and the evolution of female dominance in the spotted hyena
Proc R Soc B, June 22, 2009; 276(1665): 2291 - 2298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.