Skip Navigation



Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on October 11, 2007

Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/arm092
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/6/1146    most recent
arm092v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baird, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Baird, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, A. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Behavioral attributes influence annual mating success more than morphological traits in male collared lizards

Troy A. Bairda, John M. Hranitzb, Dusti K. Timanusa and Andrew M. Schwartza

a Department of Biology, University of Central Oklahoma, 100 North University Drive, Edmond, OK 73034, USA b Department of Biological and Allied Health Sciences, Bloomsburg University, Bloomsburg, PA 17815, USA

Address correspondence to T.A. Baird. E-mail: tbaird{at}ucok.edu.


   Abstract

Traits that potentially influence mating success (MS) may be "static" with low lability once they develop or "dynamic" with highly modifiable expression. We used principal components (PCs) analyses of dynamic behavioral and morphological traits that are static over the short term to determine their relative contributions to the ability of territorial male collared lizards to acquire access to females and obtain high MS. We estimated annual MS of males as the relative frequency with which they engaged in courtship with reproductively active resident females. Three PCs explained statistically significant phenotypic variation among males. Morphological traits loaded significantly on 2 PCs that explained 26.3% and 13.0% of the variance, respectively, whereas behavioral variables loaded significantly on a different component that explained 15.7% of the variance in male traits. The frequency with which males initiated aggressive encounters with same-sex competitors did not load significantly on these PC axes. Males having behavioral PC scores above the mean had significantly higher MS than those with behavioral scores below the mean, whereas male MS was not related to component scores for either of the axes describing static morphological variables. Results indicate that in our population behavior patterns associated with advertisement, particularly to females, influence male MS more strongly than morphological traits or the initiation of direct aggression with same-sex competitors.

Key words: behavior, collared lizard, mating success, morphology.

Received 22 January 2007; revised 8 September 2007; accepted 8 September 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
K. B. Karsten, L. N. Andriamandimbiarisoa, S. F. Fox, and C. J. Raxworthy
Sexual selection on body size and secondary sexual characters in 2 closely related, sympatric chameleons in Madagascar
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2009; 20(5): 1079 - 1088.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
T. A. Baird
A growth cost of experimentally induced conspicuous coloration in first-year collared lizard males
Behav. Ecol., February 27, 2008; (2008) arn014v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.