Skip Navigation



Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on November 17, 2007

Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/arm108
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/1/79    most recent
arm108v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hauber, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Moskát, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hauber, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Moskát, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Shared parental care is costly for nestlings of common cuckoos and their great reed warbler hosts

Márk E. Haubera and Csaba Moskátb

a School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 1143, Auckland, New Zealand b Animal Ecology Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, c/o Hungarian Natural History Museum, Ludovika ter 2., Budapest H-1083, Hungary

Address correspondence to M.E. Hauber. E-mail: m.hauber{at}auckland.ac.nz.


   Abstract

Obligate avian brood parasitism typically involves one of 2 strategies: parasite chicks are either 1) virulent and evict all other eggs and nest mates to be raised alone or 2) more tolerant and share foster parental care with host chicks for some or the entirety of the nestling period. We studied the consequences of experimentally forced mixed broods of age-matched one common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) and 2 great reed warbler (Acrocephalus arundinaceus) chicks. In these broods, both cuckoo and host chicks grew slower than did either individual cuckoos or great reed warblers in broods of 1 parasite or 3 host chicks, respectively. Video records showed that in mixed broods, cuckoo chicks received feedings less frequently than the 33% predicted by chance at 4 days of age but parental food allocations increased to chance levels at 8 days of age. The consistent patterns of lower growth rates arose even though chicks in broods of 1 parasite and 2 hosts received the largest prey items per feeding. In addition, several other measures of parental provisioning also did not predict species and brood-specific differences in nestling growth rates across the different treatments. However, variation in begging displays and its specific costs on host and parasite chicks in the different nest treatments were not quantified in this study. We conclude that young of nest mate–evictor common cuckoos benefit from the sole occupancy of host nests in part owing to an initial competitive disadvantage for parental care in broods with age-matched great reed warbler chicks.

Key words: brood parasitism, chick discrimination, eviction behavior, nestling competition, parental provisioning, virulence.

Received 23 April 2007; revised 19 September 2007; accepted 28 September 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
A. Janssen, A. H. Grosman, E. G. Cordeiro, E. F. de Brito, J. O. Fonseca, F. Colares, A. Pallini, E. R. Lima, and M. W. Sabelis
Context-dependent fitness effects of behavioral manipulation by a parasitoid
Behav. Ecol., November 11, 2009; (2009) arp153v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
T. Grim, J. Rutila, P. Cassey, and M. E. Hauber
The cost of virulence: an experimental study of egg eviction by brood parasitic chicks
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2009; 20(5): 1138 - 1146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.