Skip Navigation



Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on April 15, 2008

Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/arm152
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/4/703    most recent
arm152v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Piault, R.
Right arrow Articles by Roulin, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Piault, R.
Right arrow Articles by Roulin, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Experimental support for the makeup hypothesis in nestling tawny owls (Strix aluco)

Romain Piaulta, Julien Gasparinia, Pierre Bizeb, Mariane Pauleta, Kevin J. McGrawc and Alexandre Roulina

a Department of Ecology and Evolution, Biophore, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland b Division of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, IBLS, Graham Kerr Building, Glasgow University, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK c School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4501, USA

Address correspondence to R. Piault. E-mail: romain.piault{at}unil.ch.


   Abstract

Body condition can affect coloration of traits used in sexual selection and parent–offspring communication by inducing rapid internal changes in pigment concentration or aggregation, thickness of collagen arrays, or blood flux. The recent "makeup hypothesis" proposes an alternative honesty-reinforcing mechanism, with behaviorally mediated deposition of substances on body surfaces ("cosmetics") generating covariation between body condition and coloration. In birds, the uropygial gland wax is actively spread on feathers using the bill and changes in its deposition rate may cause rapid changes in bill and plumage coloration. Using tawny owl nestlings, we tested 3 predictions of the makeup hypothesis, namely that 1) quantity of preen wax deposited accounts for variation in bill coloration, 2) an immune stimulation (induced by injection of a lipopolysaccharide [LPS]) impairs uropygial gland wax production, and 3) different intensities of immune stimulations (strong vs. weak stimulations induced by injections of either LPS or phytohemagglutinin [PHA], respectively) and high versus low food availabilities result in different bill colorations. We found that 1) preen wax reduced bill brightness, 2) a challenge with LPS impaired uropygial gland development, and 3) nestlings challenged with LPS had a brighter bill than PHA-injected nestlings, whereas diet manipulation had no significant effect. Altogether, these results suggest that a strong immune challenge may decrease preen wax deposition rate on the bill of nestling birds, at least by impairing gland wax production, which causes a change in bill coloration. Our study therefore highlights that cosmetic colors might signal short-term variation in immunological status.

Key words: bill coloration, immune status, makeup hypothesis, preening behavior, preen wax, uropygial gland.

Received 7 June 2007; revised 16 November 2007; accepted 6 December 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.