Skip Navigation



Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on April 4, 2008

Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/arn038
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/4/842    most recent
arn038v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ioannou, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Krause, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ioannou, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Krause, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Search rate, attack probability, and the relationship between prey density and prey encounter rate

Christos C. Ioannoua, Graeme D. Ruxtonb and Jens Krausea

a Institute of Integrative and Comparative Biology, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK b Division of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, University of Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK

Address correspondence to C.C. Ioannou. E-mail: bgycci{at}leeds.ac.uk.


   Abstract

Although numerous influential models in ecology assume a directly proportional relationship between prey density and prey encounter rate, a recent test of this assumption found that the actual relationship was nonlinear (rising slower than proportionately). Here, three-spined sticklebacks were used to test 2 recently proposed mechanisms based on predator search behavior that may induce this nonlinearity: the effect of increasing search rate over the course of the search and the effect of spatial correlation in areas searched. The fish explored a novel apparatus of 16 cells (15 x 16 cm) arranged in a ring, with each cell connected to the 2 adjacent cells by small openings. Hence, the arena was effectively one dimensional, simplifying the recording of search paths and removing edge effects. The relationship between prey density and encounter rate was found to be less than directly proportional, confirming the findings of a previous study using great tits searching for caterpillars. In the majority of our trials, the search rate accelerated as more of the arena was searched. Moreover, the greater this acceleration the less prey density and encounter rate were directly proportional. There was no evidence found, however, that spatial autocorrelation had any effect. We also found an interesting effect of prey density on the likelihood that an encounter with a prey would lead to an attack. Once prey were encountered, the probability of attack increased with the number of cells already visited, leading to a higher probability of attacking first-encountered prey at lower prey densities.

Key words: detection, encounter rate, foraging, search rate, three-spined stickleback.

Received 17 December 2007; revised 3 March 2008; accepted 4 March 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.