Skip Navigation



Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on August 4, 2008

Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/arn081
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/6/1243    most recent
arn081v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Delmore, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Delmore, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, R. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Sex allocation and parental quality in tree swallows

Kira E. Delmorea, Oddmund Klevenb, Terje Laskemoenb, Susan A. Crowea, Jan T. Lifjeldb and Raleigh J. Robertsona

a Department of Biology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada b Natural History Museum, Department of Zoology, University of Oslo, PO Box 1172 Blindern, NO-0318 Oslo, Norway

Address correspondence to K.E. Delmore, who is now at Department of Biological Anthropology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada. E-mail: kedelmor{at}ucalgary.ca.


   Abstract

In species with extrapair mating, females may choose a social mate who will contribute to the successful raising of their brood and a sire who can enhance the genetic quality of offspring. Female choice of social mate and genetic sire may thus be independent events, directed toward different types of reproductive benefits. Furthermore, if reproductive benefits derived through mating preferences differ for sons and daughters, a coupling between sex ratio adjustment and mate choice would be favored by selection. In this paper, we examined whether females adjust the primary sex ratio of offspring to the quality of the social male and/or the extrapair sire in a socially monogamous species with frequent extrapair mating, the tree swallow Tachycineta bicolor. Recent evidence suggests that females obtain compatible genes’ benefits through extrapair mating in this species. If genetic quality is more important for male than female fitness and contributes to higher variance in reproductive success among males than females, sex allocation theory would predict a male-biased sex ratio among extrapair offspring. However, we found no indication of sex ratio bias with paternity in mixed paternity broods. Instead, females skewed the sex ratio toward males in broods without extrapair paternity, which probably reflects a higher phenotypic quality of these males. Furthermore, we confirmed earlier findings that females in good condition produce male-biased broods. Thus, our results indicate that female tree swallows adjust the primary sex ratio to the phenotypic quality of their social mate and themselves and not to the genetic sire of their offspring.

Key words: extrapair paternity, maternal condition, sex ratio, Tachycineta bicolor.

Received 22 August 2007; revised 9 April 2008; accepted 15 May 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
L. S. Johnson, C. F. Thompson, S. K. Sakaluk, M. Neuhauser, B. G.P. Johnson, S. S. Soukup, S. J. Forsythe, and B. S. Masters
Extra-pair young in house wren broods are more likely to be male than female
Proc R Soc B, June 22, 2009; 276(1665): 2285 - 2289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.