Skip Navigation



Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on October 9, 2008

Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/arn126
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/1/145    most recent
arn126v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Michelena, P.
Right arrow Articles by McLeod, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Michelena, P.
Right arrow Articles by McLeod, J. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Effects of group size and personality on social foraging: the distribution of sheep across patches

Pablo Michelena, Angela M. Sibbald, Hans W. Erhard and James E. McLeod

Macaulay Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, UK

Address correspondence to P. Michelena, who is now at Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, CNRS, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse III, UMR 5169, 118 Route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse Cedex 9, France. E-mail: michelen{at}cict.fr.


   Abstract

Group cohesion in social animals foraging in patchy environments depends on 2 opposite forces, intraspecific competition, and attraction. The decision to leave or stay in a group may vary according to the individual personality. We investigated the role of personality when feeding competition increases as a result of increasing group size. Individuals referred as "bold" and "shy" were identified from an indoor exploration test according to their propensity to leave the group to explore a novel environment, using 12 novel objects placed at increasing distances from the group. Groups of 2, 4, 6, or 8 shy or bold sheep were tested in 45 x 5–m grass arenas, with one 5 x 5–m patch of preferred vegetation at each end. Sheep grazed on or close to these patches, but the number grazing the patches seldom reached more than 4–5 individuals, suggesting that crowding might affect foraging at the highest densities. The smallest groups grazed together on the same patch, but there was an increasing likelihood of splitting into subgroups as group size increased, with equal-sized subgroups most commonly grazing the 2 patches simultaneously. This effect was greatest in bold sheep, which tended to split into subgroups at smaller group sizes than shy sheep. This study provides new insight into the mechanisms by which group-living herbivores distribute themselves across patchy resources in a way that minimizes interference competition and demonstrates the importance of individual variability for spatial organization at the level of the group.

Key words: bold, grazing, ideal free distribution, Ovis aries, shy, social cohesion.

Received 12 November 2007; revised 4 September 2008; accepted 8 September 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.