Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access first published online on February 12, 2009
This version published online on February 23, 2009

Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/arp017
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/3/459    most recent
arp017v2
arp017v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cheney, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cheney, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, N. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Mimicry in coral reef fish: how accurate is this deception in terms of color and luminance?

Karen L. Cheneya and N. Justin Marshallb

a School of Integrative Biology b School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia

Address correspondence to K.L. Cheney. E-mail: k.cheney{at}uq.edu.au.


   Abstract

Batesian and aggressive mimics are considered to be under selective pressure to resemble their models, whereas signal receivers are under selection to discriminate between mimics and models. However, the perceptual ability of signal receivers to discriminate between mimics and models is rarely studied. Here we examined 15 model–mimic coral reef fish pairs using nonsubjective methods to judge the accuracy of mimics in terms of color and luminance. We then investigated the potential ability of fish with various visual systems to discriminate between model and mimic colors using theoretical vision models. We found the majority of mimics closely resembled models in terms of color and luminance from a nonsubjective perspective. However, fish that have potentially trichromatic (3 distinct cone photoreceptors) visual systems with ultraviolet sensitivity had a much better capacity to discriminate between models and mimics compared with fish with midrange sensitivity or dichromatic (2 cone photoreceptors) fish. The spectral reflectance of color patches reflected by models and mimics became more similar with an increase in depth, indicating that signal receivers may be more likely to distinguish mimics from models in habitats located closer to the surface. There was no such change in luminance contrast with depth. The selection pressure on mimics to accurately resemble their model is therefore predicted to vary depending on the visual system of the signal receiver and the light environment.

Key words: aggressive mimicry, animal signaling, Batesian, color vision, signal accuracy.


Figure 2 has been updated in color.

Received 11 September 2008; revised 4 December 2008; accepted 8 January 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.