Skip Navigation



Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on March 17, 2009

Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/arp031
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/3/553    most recent
arp031v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Santos, E. S.A.
Right arrow Articles by Macedo, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Santos, E. S.A.
Right arrow Articles by Macedo, R. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Condition-dependent resource value affects male–male competition in the blue–black grassquit

Eduardo S.A. Santosa,b, Rafael Maiaa,b and Regina H. Macedoa

a Laboratório de Comportamento Animal, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade de Brasília, 70910-900 Brasília, Brazil b Departamento de Ecologia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Universidade de Brasília, 70910-900 Brasília, Brazil

Address correspondence to E.S.A. Santos. E-mail: e.salves{at}gmail.com.


   Abstract

Male–male competition frequently can be resolved without overt aggression through the use of behavioral and phenotypic traits that signal body condition, dominance status, and fighting ability. In this study, we used male blue–black grassquits (Volatinia jacarina) to examine the relationship between male dominance status and behavioral, body condition, and ornamental traits in intrasexual agonistic encounters over a food resource. We found an association between body condition and winning, where winners were lighter than losers. This pattern was explained by low amounts of aggression exhibited by losers when they were heavy. In addition to being lighter, winners were, on average, up to 5 times more aggressive than the heavier losers. There were no associations between ornamental characteristics and dominance status, which suggests that male blue–black grassquits do not exhibit a badge signaling body condition and fighting ability, and we propose that such ornamental characteristics may be more functional in mate-choice contexts. However, the amount of male nuptial plumage of winners predicted the aggressiveness of their opponents, suggesting a social cost for sustaining this ornament.

Key words: body condition, intrasexual selection, male–male competition, sexual selection, structural plumage, UV coloration.

Received 27 June 2008; revised 6 January 2009; accepted 17 January 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.